On XForms

July 23rd, 2010 § 0

Several months ago, I wrote a post about my XForms development in the Scholars’ Lab as part of a research project. I’m currently working on two research projects that utilize the standard: EADitor (Encoded Archival Description management and dissemination framework) and Numishare (geared towards online delivery of numismatic collections, though other artifacts can be represented). Despite its promise, XForms has not quite swept up the library world yet (though it is most definitely generating some buzz). The W3C standard is a definition for creating dynamic webforms that handle complex, hierarchical XML data–the type of stuff libraries deal with daily. However, only in recent years have XForms processors matured to the point they are ready for mass-market consumption. There are numerous private firms developing XForms applications, including Wachovia, Cisco, and Pfizer. It is also used to some degree in the academic community. As far as I am aware, not many institutions are running it in production, though some are rapidly moving in that direction. The XForms4Lib listserv created in the fall has 80 members from across North American and European academia.

Which brings me to my point. » Read the rest of this entry «

WMS vs. tilecaching

June 30th, 2010 § 0

In our work on Neatline, we have made a deliberate choice to start by constraining ourselves to map-sources that are quickly and easily provided through WMS. This leaves out (for now) two popular sources of map imagery; Google Maps and Open Street Map. I’m going to explain why we made that choice, and why, when we do come to make these sources usable with Neatline, we will do so with great care and with an eye to scholarly method. » Read the rest of this entry «

Frontiers in Spatial Humanities (video)

June 1st, 2010 § 0

A video stream of the final event of our NEH-funded Institute for Enabling Geospatial Scholarship (or #geoinst as it’s known on Twitter) is now available! Thanks to all our wonderful participants for making these lightning talks, collectively entitled “Frontiers in Spatial Humanities,” so thought-provoking.

The Scholars’ Lab/NEH Institute for Enabling Geospatial Scholarship was held at the University of Virginia Library May 25-27, 2010 and concluded with a set of two-minute, three-slide lightning talks by Institute attendees on their own spatial humanities projects and works-in-progress.

Frontiers in Spatial Humanities

May 17th, 2010 § 0

[UPDATE: video for the "Frontiers" event is now available!]

We’re crowd-sourcing the keynote to the final round of the Scholars’ Lab/NEH 2009-2010 Institute for Enabling Geospatial Scholarship. With all of these fantastic attendees on hand — not to mention the Institute faculty — how could we let the opportunity slip by?

Frontiers in Spatial Humanities:
Lightning Presentations

We are pleased to host 40 rapid-fire, 2-minute demos of boundary-pushing projects in spatial humanities. The scholars presenting their work come from 27 different institutions, and were competitively selected to attend this prestigious program, funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities. Some of our Institute faculty will also offer brief glimpses of their work as part of a whirlwind tour of emerging work in humanities GIS.

While admission to the Institute itself is now closed, “Frontiers in Spatial Humanities” and the reception that follows are open to the public!

I’d like to thank the NEH for its generous funding of our training program, and the University of Virginia Library for supporting the Scholars’ Lab — as well as the “Frontiers” reception, to which you’re all invited!

Thursday, May 27th, 3:30-5:00pm
Harrison-Small Auditorium

For more information about the SLab and our NEH-funded Institute for Advanced Topics in the Digital Humanities, please visit:
http://lib.virginia.edu/scholarslab/geospatial/

Why Ruby?

May 11th, 2010 § 0

Stemming from a Twitter conversation last month, I thought it would be a good idea to describe — in more than the 140 character bursts that Twitter allows — why we at the Scholars’ Lab often promote Ruby, opposed to one of the other 4 or 5 languages we develop with. This isn’t an attempt to declare one language “the best,” but is meant to lay out some of the fundamental reasons why we use Ruby in the context of our digital humanities work and why we think it’s a nice language to suggest to folks just starting to program. » Read the rest of this entry «

Julie Meloni: N-dimensional Archives

May 7th, 2010 § 0

Julie Meloni, Jerome McGann, and Bethany Nowviskie discuss ways of reconsidering the multivalent cultural record in a digital age

 

Introducing DAVILA

May 7th, 2010 § 0

Jean Bauer, former Scholars’ Lab Graduate Fellow in Digital Humanities announces: “I have just released my first open source project. HUZZAH!”

DAVILA is a database schema visualization/annotation tool that creates “humanist readable” technical diagrams. It is written in Processing with the toxiclibs physics library and released under GPLv3. DAVILA takes in the database’s schema and a pipe separated customization file and uses them to produce an interactive, color-coded, annotated diagram similar in format to UML. There are many applications that will create technical diagrams based on database schema, but as a digital humanist I require more than they can provide. » Read the rest of this entry «

GIS: The (rare) Tartan-Plaid Point Dispersion Problem

May 7th, 2010 § 0

Have you ever wondered what would happen to your map of points if while converting your coordinates from latitude/longitude in degrees, minutes, seconds (DMS) to decimal degrees (DD) you messed up the math?  Ever seen a weird tartan-like plaid pattern emerge on your map from points that were suppose to be uniformly spread out over the known extent?  Or wonder why coordinates are much more commonly stored as decimal degrees by computer GIS applications instead of the degrees-minutes-seconds most of us learn growing up?  If so, this blog entry from the Scholars’ Lab at the University of Virginia Library is for you! » Read the rest of this entry «

Automating Omeka Deployment with Capistrano

April 20th, 2010 § 0

If you’ve done much web development, you’ll know that deploying applications can be a real pain. Typically you get some code (like Omeka), FTP it to your server, run the install, then go grab some plugins and themes and FTP them to your server. If you’re a bit more sophisticated, you may have put this in to an source code management (SCM) system like git, mercurial, or subversion, which then changes your workflow to editing on your local machine, committing the changes to your SCM, logging on to the command line interface for your server, running an update on the code, praying nothing breaks; if it does, you then try to roll back to a working version (you remembered to run svn info on the code before updating so you know what number to go back to). Even if everything goes swimmingly, that’s a lot of steps and way more applications than I like to fool with, and since it’s essentially doing the same thing over and over again, wouldn’t it be nice to automate this process? » Read the rest of this entry «